simulation-argument.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the simulation-argument.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host simulation-argument.com. Currently, hosted in Singapore and its service provider is CloudFlare Inc. .

nickbostrom.com 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called cloudflare containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

here you can peruse the debate that followed the paper presenting . the original paper is here, as are popular synopses, scholarly papers commenting or expanding on or critiquing the first paper, and some replies by the author. continues to attract a great deal of attention. i apologize for not usually being able to respond to individual inquiries. i hope you might find what you're looking for on this page. are you living in a computer simulation? original html pdf nick bostrom. philosophical quarterly, 2003, vol. 53, no. 211, pp. 243-255. (an earlier draft was circulated in 2001) follow this paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a “posthuman” stage; (2) any posthuman civilization is extremely unlikely to run a significant number of simulations of their evolutionary history (or variations thereof); (3) we are almost certainly living in a computer simulation. it follows that the belief that there is a significant chance that we will one day become posthumans who run ancestor-simulations is false, unless we are currently living in a simulation. a number of other consequences of this result are also discussed. " is perhaps the first interesting argument for the existence of a creator in 2000 years." - david pearce (exaggerated compliment) "thank you so much, dr. bostrom. you have proved that my psychiatrist was wrong all along." - anonymous correpondent (misfiring compliment) some popular synopses nick bostrom interviewed about philosophy bites. 14 august, 2011 interview for the philosophy bites podcast. david chalmers interviewed on bloggingheads.com david chalmers may 22, 2007 david chalmers, a philosopher at anu, talks about and assigns 20% probability to being in a simulation. video interview of nick bostrom on adam ford february 2013 : why the probability that you are living in the matrix is quite high. nick bostrom times higher educational supplement, may 16, 2003 another popularization. (has been translated into spanish , russian .) our lives, controlled from some guy's couch john tierny new york times, 14 august, 2007 article in ny times why make a matrix? and why you might be in one. nick bostrom in more matrix and philosophy: revolutions and reloaded decoded, ed. william irwin (open court, 2005). yet another popularization, for matrix-aficionados. do we live in a computer simulation? nick bostrom new scientist , vol. 192, no. 2579, 19 november , pp. 38-39, 2006. a very brief, popular synopsis. but please read the original paper (above) instead if you can. explained by elon musk. vox 2016 simulism wiki a wiki devoted to created by ivo jansch. spooky youtube video here . frequently asked questions faq nick bostrom 2011 answers to 16 common questions. scholarly commentaries and follow-on studies how to live in a simulation html pdf robin hanson journal of evolution and technology, vol. 7, 2001 if you might be living in a simulation then all else equal you should care less about others, live more for today, make your world look more likely to become rich, expect to and try more to participate in pivotal events, be more entertaining and praiseworthy, and keep the famous people around you happier and more interested in you. the matrix as metaphysics david chalmers 2003 on several brains-in-vats and matrix-like scenarios. argues in support of what is also my contention, that the simulation-hypothesis is not a radical skeptical hypothesis. innocence lost: simulation scenarios: prospects and consequences barry dainton draft, 2002 those who believe suitably programmed computers could enjoy conscious experience of the sort we enjoy must accept the possibility that their own experience is being generated as part of a computerized simulation. it would be a mistake to dismiss this is just one more radical sceptical possibility: for as bostrom has recently noted, if advances in computer technology were to continue at close to present rates, there would be a strong probability that we are each living in a computer simulation. the first part of this paper is devoted to broadening the scope of the argument: even if computers cannot sustain consciousness (as many dualists and materialists believe), there may still be a strong likelihood that we are living simulated lives. the implications of this result are the focus of the second part of the paper. the topics discussed include: the doomsday argument, scepticism, the different modes of virtual life, transcendental idealism, the problem of evil, and simulation ethics. are you a sim? brian weatherson philosophical quarterly, 53: 425-31, 2003. weatherson is prepared to accept up to, but not including, the final step, in which i use the bland principle of indifference. in this paper, he examines four different ways to understand this principle and argues that none of them serves the purpose. (for my reply, see the paper below.) note that weatherson accepts the third disjunct in the conclusion of - i.e. that there are many more simulated human-like persons than non-simulated ones. by contrast, i do not accept this: i think we currently lack grounds for eliminating either of the three disjuncts. living in a simulated universe. john d. barrow universe or multiverse? ed. bernard carr (cambridge university press): pp. 481-486, 2007 we explain why, if we live in a simulated reality, we might expect to see occasional glitches and small drifts in the supposed constants and laws of nature over time. : reply to weatherson. nick bostrom philosophical quarterly vol. 55, no. 218, pp. 90-97, 2005 my reply to weatherson's paper (above). i argue he has misinterpreted the relevant indifference principle and that he has not provided any sound argument against the correct interpretation, nor has he addressed the arguments for this principle that i gave in the original paper. there also a few words on the difference between and traditional brain-in-a-vat arguments, and on so-called epistemological externalism. simulation scenarios barry dainton powerpoint presentation, 2003 covers many related issues, but may be hard to understand without the oral presentation that is meant to go with these 79 slides. again. anthony brueckner analysis ,vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 224-226, 2008. short article by brueckner in which he proffers "a new way of thinking about bostrom's argument". (see below for my reply.) : some explanations nick bostrom analysis, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 458-261, 2009 my response to brueckner (above), in which i argue that he has misconstrued . i also argue that he is mistaken in his critique of the idea that simulated beings may themselves create ancestor-simulations. historical simulations - motivational, ethical and legal issues peter s. jenkins journal of futures studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23-42, 2006 a future society will very likely have the technological ability and the motivation to create large numbers of completely realistic historical simulations and be able to overcome any ethical and legal obstacles to doing so. it is thus highly probable that we are a form of artificial intelligence inhabiting one of these simulations. to avoid stacking (i.e. simulations within simulations), the termination of these simulations is likely to be the point in history when the technology to create them first became widely available, (estimated to be 2050). long range planning beyond this date would therefore be futile. are we living in a matrix? what can computers tell us about god? hooman katarai powerpoint presentation, 2004 an mit computer science grad student theologizes. theological implications of eric steinhart ars disputandi, vol. 10, pp. 1566-5399, 2010 nick bostrom’s simulation argument (sa) has many intriguing theological implications. we work out some of them here. we show how the sa can be used to develop novel versions of the cosmological and design arguments. we then develop some of the affinities between bostrom’s naturalistic theogony and more traditional theological topics. we look at the resurrection of the body and at theodicy. we conclude with some reflections on the relations between the sa and neoplatonism (friendly) and between the sa and theism (less friendly). i, sim - an exploration of anders hammarstrom 2008 a student's ma thesis a patch for nick bostrom & marcin kulczycki analysis, vol. 71, no., 1, pp. 54-61, 2011 this article reports on a newly discovered bug in the original simulation argument. two different ways of patching the argument are proposed, each of which preserves the original conclusion. natural evil and the simulation hypothesis david kyle johnson philo, fall-winter issue, vol. 14, no. 2., 2011 some theists maintain that they need not answer the threat posed to theistic belief by natural evil; they have reason enough to believe that god exists and it renders impotent any threat that natural evil poses to theism. explicating how god and natural evil co-exist is not necessary since they already know both exist. i will argue that, even granting theists the knowledge they claim, this does not leave them in an agreeable position. it commits the theist to a very unpalatable position: our universe was not designed by god and is instead, most likely, a computer simulation. constraints on the universe as a numerical simulation silas r. beane, zohreh davoudi, martin j. savageavid 2012 a low-level physics simulation using the simplest simulation methods, which simulated our universe on a grid with finite resolution, would result in some potentially observable distortions of the simulated physics because of the rotational symmertry breaking effects of the simulation lattice. i would think that even the earlist simulations of systems sufficiently complex to contain observers would make use of powerful computational shortcuts that would eliminate the opportunity to observe any such discrepancies (mostly the simulation would take place at a much higher level of abstraction in order to reduce the computational demands). on the 'simulation argument' and selective skepticism jonathan birch erkenntnis, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 95-107, 2013 (requires journal subscription) develops an objection similar to the one discussed under question 4 in the q&a.; william eckhardt in paradoxes in probability theory (springer), chapter 4 (book link) a critical discussion in the context of the doomsday argument. the doomsday argument and peter j. lewis synthese, january 2013 (requires journal subscription) analyzes some analogies and disanalogies between the doomsday argument and , and concludes that the former fails whille the latter succeeds. some background readings traditional philosophical skepticism and brain-in-a-vat arguments: skepticism: a contemporary reader derose, k. and warfield, t. a. (eds.) oxford university press, oxford. 1999. on anticipated technological capability of running realistic simulations: whole brain emulation: a roadmap sandberg, a. and bostrom, n. technical report #2008-3, future of humanity institute, oxford university, 2008 minimum energy requirements of information transfer and computing. bremermann, h. j. international journal of theoretical physics 21: 203-217, 1982 superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies bostrom, n. (2014) oxford university press, oxford. engines of creation: the coming era of nanotechnology. drexler, k. e. london, forth estate, 1985 how long before superintelligence? bostrom, n. international journal of futures studies, vol. 2, 1998 nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation. drexler, k. e. new york, john wiley & sons, inc., 1999 matrioshka brains. drexler, k. e. new york, john wiley & sons, inc., 1992 nanomedicine: volume 1: basic capabilities. freitas, r. a. , jr. landes bioscience, 1998 the age of spiritual machines: when computers exceed human intelligence kurzweil, r.. new york, viking, 1999 ultimate physical limits to computation lloyd, s. nature 406 (31 august): 1047-1054, 2000 mind children moravec, h. harvard, harvard university press, 1989 robot: mere machine to transcendent mind moravec, h. new york, oxford university press, 1999 pigs in cyberspace moravec, h. extropy #10, winter/spring issue. 1993 the physics of information processing superobjects: the daily life among the jupiter brains sandberg, a. journal of evolution and technology, vol. 5., 1999 the physics of immortality frank j. tipler doubleday, 1994 existential risks (how we could fail to develop the required technologies): existential risks: analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards html pdf nick bostrom journal of evolution and technology, vol. 9, 2002 existential risks reduction as global priority html pdf nick bostrom global policy journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 15-31, 2013 the methodology of observation selection effects: anthropic bias: observation selection effects in science and philosophy nick bostrom routledge, new york. 2002 anthropic-principle.com nick bostrom website containing introductions and preprints miscellaneous the planetarium hypothesis: a resolution of the fermi paradox stephen baxter journal of the british interplanetary society, vol. 54, no. 5/6, pp. 210-216. 2001. some simulation-scenarios depicted in fiction: bedlam christopher brookmyre novel, 2013 permutation city greg egan novel 1995 the matrix directed by andy wachowski and larry wachowski film, parts i-iii (1999-2003) the thirteenth floor directed by joseph rusnak film 1999 vanilla sky directed by cameron crowe film, 2001, based on the film open your eyes open your eyes (abres los ojos) directed by alejandro amenábar film, 1997 i don't know, timmy, being god is a big responsibility sam hughes short story, 2007 welt am draht directed by rainer fassbinder film, 1973. (trevor levick suggests this might be the original of all matrix-type films.) note: this is by no means a complete list. some others include simulacron iii (1963) , aka counterfeit world, by daniel f. galouye, which was made into the movie welt am draht (1973) by rainer werner fassbinder (the thirteenth floor was also based on simulacron iii); exit to reality (1997) by edith forbes; otherland by tad williams (1996-2001); the film dark city (1950, 1998); existenz (film directed by david cronenberg, 1999); many stories by philip k. dick; realtime interrupt (1995) by james p. hogan, etc. etc. jay shreib produced a play inspired by , world of wires, which opened in new york in january 2012. miscellaneous world of wires a play inspired by , new york, 2012. nick pasztor drops a beat simulation argument (extended simulated remix) about nick bostrom nick bostrom is a professor at oxford university, where he directs the future of humanity institute (fhi) and co-directs the governance of ai program . his homepage is at nickbostrom.com . bibliography

URL analysis for simulation-argument.com

https://www.simulation-argument.com/matrix.html
http://www.simulation-argument.com/brueckner.pdf
https://www.simulation-argument.com/matrix-spanish.html
http://www.simulation-argument.com/faq.html
https://www.simulation-argument.com/matrix2.html
https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.pdf
http://www.simulation-argument.com/daintonpower.ppt
http://www.simulation-argument.com/hammarstrom.pdf
https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html
http://www.simulation-argument.com/johnson.pdf
http://www.simulation-argument.com/barrowsim.pdf
https://www.simulation-argument.com/computer.pdf
http://www.simulation-argument.com/dainton.pdf
http://www.simulation-argument.com/weatherson.pdf
http://www.simulation-argument.com/weathersonreply.pdf
fhi.ox.ac.uk
amazon.co.uk
philosophy.ox.ac.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Whois Server Version 2.0

Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.

Domain Name: SIMULATION-ARGUMENT.COM
Registrar: WILD WEST DOMAINS, LLC
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 440
Whois Server: whois.wildwestdomains.com
Referral URL: http://www.wildwestdomains.com
Name Server: NS3.BLTC.NET
Name Server: NS4.BLTC.NET
Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 13-apr-2017
Creation Date: 31-oct-2001
Expiration Date: 31-oct-2018

>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-07-21T21:41:23Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR WILD WEST DOMAINS, LLC

  REFERRER http://www.wildwestdomains.com

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =simulation-argument.com

  PORT 43

  SERVER whois.wildwestdomains.com

  ARGS simulation-argument.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME simulation-argument.com

NSERVER

  NS3.BLTC.NET 52.44.246.5

  NS4.BLTC.NET 52.44.246.5

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

  CHANGED 2017-04-13

  CREATED 2001-10-31

  EXPIRES 2018-10-31

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .